Ransomware gang
Conti
Claims on its leak site since 31 July 2020; none in the last 12 months
- Claims, 12 months
- 0
- Last 30 days
- 0
- All claims
- 351
- Last claim
- 7 June 2022
ransomware.live lists Akira, Silentransomgroup as descended from Conti.
Where its claimed victims are
Sectors
Claims matched to an official notice
12 organisations Conti claimed also filed a breach notice with a regulator, 11 of them after the claim (a median of 107 days later). Matched by name: the notice does not say who the attacker was.
- Elevate Services, Inc.
Claimed 14 April 2022 · notice filed with the California Attorney General 28 December 2022 - Acuity Brands, Inc.
Claimed 15 January 2022 · notice filed with the California Attorney General 6 December 2022 - TIC International Corporation
Claimed 12 April 2022 · notice filed with the California Attorney General 2 November 2022 - Marymount Manhattan College
Claimed 16 November 2021 · notice filed with the California Attorney General 3 August 2022 - Snap-on, Inc.
Claimed 10 April 2022 · notice filed with the California Attorney General 7 April 2022 - Shutterfly, LLC
Claimed 15 January 2022 · notice filed with the California Attorney General 23 March 2022 - National Math and Science Initiative
Claimed 21 October 2021 · notice filed with the California Attorney General 7 February 2022 - Spencer Gifts LLC
Claimed 5 December 2021 · notice filed with the California Attorney General 24 January 2022 - McMenamins, Inc.
Claimed 21 December 2021 · notice filed with the Washington Attorney General 30 December 2021 - Cedar Grove Composting, Inc.
Claimed 24 September 2021 · notice filed with the Washington Attorney General 30 November 2021 - SAC Wireless, LLC
Claimed 16 June 2021 · notice filed with the California Attorney General 26 August 2021 - Rehoboth McKinley Christian Health Care Services
Claimed 1 February 2021 · notice filed with the California Attorney General 19 May 2021
Government advisories
What a claim is, and is not
A claim is a ransomware gang naming an organisation on its leak site, usually to pressure it into paying. It is the gang’s word: some claims are false, recycled from older breaches or exaggerated, and a claim says nothing about whose personal data, if any, was taken. That is why we count claims but do not list the organisations, and why a breach goes on the tracker as confirmed only when the organisation or a regulator says so.
How this is counted
Claims as collected from the gangs’ leak sites by ransomware.live, which says itself that they are unverified. We read its list every day and keep only counts: by month, by the victim’s country and by sector (as ransomware.live classifies them). Matches with official notices are by the organisation’s name, from 30 days before the claim to a year after it, against California’s and Washington’s full breach registers and every official notice on the tracker. A match is not a confirmation rate: those registers only see breaches of their own residents, and names are written differently. We never link to or visit leak sites.
From the data breach tracker: official notices, breach databases and the news, every fact with its source. Open data (CC BY 4.0) · How the tracker works · Found a mistake? Tell us and we correct it.